The vast majority of natural selection calculations rely on nonsynonymous to synonymous calculations. That's no longer Dope.

The vast majority of natural selection calculations rely on nonsynonymous to synonymous calculations. 

This is because synonymous mutations are generally thought to be neutral, meaning that they do not affect the fitness of an organism. Therefore, the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous mutations (Ka/Ks) can be used to estimate the strength of natural selection acting on a gene.

However, recent studies have shown that synonymous mutations can also be non-neutral, meaning that they can affect the fitness of an organism. This is because synonymous mutations can affect gene expression, RNA splicing, and protein folding. For example, a synonymous mutation can change the codon usage (Codon bias) of a gene, which can affect the expression of that gene. Or, a synonymous mutation can change the splicing pattern of a gene, which can produce different proteins.

Non-neutral synonymous mutations can have a significant impact on natural selection calculations. For example, if a gene is under strong purifying selection, then the Ka/Ks ratio will be low. However, if the gene is under relaxed purifying selection, or even positive selection, then the Ka/Ks ratio will be higher. Therefore, if non-neutral synonymous mutations are present in a gene, then the Ka/Ks ratio will not be an accurate estimate of the strength of natural selection.

Non-neutral synonymous mutations can significantly impact natural selection calculations, including the McDonald-Kreitman test.

The McDonald-Kreitman test is a statistical test used to compare the rates of synonymous and nonsynonymous mutations between two species. Synonymous mutations are mutations that do not change the amino acid sequence of a protein, while nonsynonymous mutations do. The McDonald-Kreitman test assumes that synonymous mutations are neutral, meaning that they do not affect the fitness of an organism. Under this assumption, the ratio of synonymous to nonsynonymous mutations should be the same in both species. However, if non-neutral synonymous mutations are present, this can violate the assumption of neutrality and lead to inaccurate results from the McDonald-Kreitman test. 

It is important to note that the impact of non-neutral synonymous mutations on natural selection calculations will depend on the specific context. In some cases, the impact may be small, while in other cases it may be significant. It is therefore important to be aware of the potential impact of non-neutral synonymous mutations when interpreting the results of natural selection calculations.

Here are some examples of how non-neutral synonymous mutations can impact natural selection calculations:

• In the McDonald-Kreitman test, non-neutral synonymous mutations can lead to false positives, meaning that the test may incorrectly conclude that nonsynonymous mutations are being driven by natural selection when they are not.

• In the estimation of the rate of nonsynonymous substitution, non-neutral synonymous mutations can lead to overestimates of the strength of natural selection.

• Non-neutral synonymous mutations can also impact other calculations of natural selection, such as the estimation of the effective population size and the time of divergence between species.

It is important to note that non-neutral synonymous mutations are not always harmful. In some cases, they can be beneficial and lead to increased fitness. However, even when non-neutral synonymous mutations are beneficial, they can still impact natural selection calculations.

Overall, it is important to be aware of the potential impact of non-neutral synonymous mutations when interpreting the results of natural selection calculations.

Could natural selection be replaced by actual "fitness"?